https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412798 A quantified recovery cannot be sustained where the underlying order does not determine the liability or explain the computation, and the affected party was not given notice and an opportunity of hearing before the demand was raised. In such circumstances, the availability of an alternative appellate remedy does not bar writ jurisdiction, because the real grievance is the absence of a lawful determination of the recoverable amount. The recovery notice was therefore quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination after hearing the petitioners. en-us Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 Nov 2021 16:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412798 A quantified recovery cannot be sustained where the underlying order does not determine the liability or explain the computation, and the affected party was not given notice and an opportunity of hearing before the demand was raised. In such circumstances, the availability of an alternative appellate remedy does not bar writ jurisdiction, because the real grievance is the absence of a lawful determination of the recoverable amount. The recovery notice was therefore quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination after hearing the petitioners. Case-Laws SEBI Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412798