<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412785</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on M/s. DIAL for the unauthorized removal of the consignment, emphasizing that custodian responsibilities under the Customs Act could not be shifted entirely to an outsourced entity. The judgment clarified the statutory obligations of custodians in handling imported goods in the Customs area, underscoring the importance of compliance and oversight in such operations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412785</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on M/s. DIAL for the unauthorized removal of the consignment, emphasizing that custodian responsibilities under the Customs Act could not be shifted entirely to an outsourced entity. The judgment clarified the statutory obligations of custodians in handling imported goods in the Customs area, underscoring the importance of compliance and oversight in such operations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>