<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1115 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412770</link>
    <description>The Corporate Debtor was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Mr. Srikanth Dwarkanath was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and a moratorium was imposed to protect the Corporate Debtor&#039;s assets. The IRP was tasked with managing the Corporate Debtor&#039;s operations and preserving its property value. The Financial Creditor was directed to pay an advance to the IRP, and the commencement of CIRP was effective immediately. The application for malicious initiation of CIRP was dismissed, and the relevant orders were communicated to all parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:55:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1115 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412770</link>
      <description>The Corporate Debtor was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Mr. Srikanth Dwarkanath was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and a moratorium was imposed to protect the Corporate Debtor&#039;s assets. The IRP was tasked with managing the Corporate Debtor&#039;s operations and preserving its property value. The Financial Creditor was directed to pay an advance to the IRP, and the commencement of CIRP was effective immediately. The application for malicious initiation of CIRP was dismissed, and the relevant orders were communicated to all parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>