<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1517 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297873</link>
    <description>The court emphasized the necessity for standardized methodology and procedures in determining profiteering under the CGST Act and Rules. It stressed the importance of consistency and fairness in decision-making processes to ensure effective implementation of anti-profiteering measures. The judgment highlighted the significance of procedural integrity, transparency, and accountability in conducting such proceedings, underscoring the need for adherence to legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1517 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297873</link>
      <description>The court emphasized the necessity for standardized methodology and procedures in determining profiteering under the CGST Act and Rules. It stressed the importance of consistency and fairness in decision-making processes to ensure effective implementation of anti-profiteering measures. The judgment highlighted the significance of procedural integrity, transparency, and accountability in conducting such proceedings, underscoring the need for adherence to legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>