https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412767 A transfer of surplus vacant land was void because the statutory conditions for lawful alienation were not met: the required statement had not been filed, no valid ceiling notification was shown at the material time, and the permission order covered only retained land, not the suit land. The alleged sale therefore could not confer title. Where the suit, though framed as one for declaration and injunction, in substance challenged auction rights arising from ceiling proceedings, civil court jurisdiction was impliedly excluded by the ceiling scheme. The jurisdictional objection, being a pure question of law, could be raised even at the appellate stage. The suit was held not maintainable. en-us Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:54:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412767 A transfer of surplus vacant land was void because the statutory conditions for lawful alienation were not met: the required statement had not been filed, no valid ceiling notification was shown at the material time, and the permission order covered only retained land, not the suit land. The alleged sale therefore could not confer title. Where the suit, though framed as one for declaration and injunction, in substance challenged auction rights arising from ceiling proceedings, civil court jurisdiction was impliedly excluded by the ceiling scheme. The jurisdictional objection, being a pure question of law, could be raised even at the appellate stage. The suit was held not maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412767