https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297862 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal. It was found that the District Valuation Officer's valuation was exaggerated and not based on actual rates, supporting the relief granted to the assessee in the appeal against the estimated addition under section 69B of the IT Act for the assessment year 2004-05. The judgment was pronounced on 16-10-2009. en-us Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Sep 2021 09:59:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297862 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the revenue's appeal. It was found that the District Valuation Officer's valuation was exaggerated and not based on actual rates, supporting the relief granted to the assessee in the appeal against the estimated addition under section 69B of the IT Act for the assessment year 2004-05. The judgment was pronounced on 16-10-2009. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297862