<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1106 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412761</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal against a demand of central excise duties on capital goods. The appellant&#039;s transition from a Domestic Tariff Area Unit to a 100% Export Oriented Unit and subsequent import of duty-free capital goods under the EPCG Scheme did not absolve them of the duty liability upon exiting the EOU status. Despite arguments on export obligations and revenue neutrality, the Court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and payment of duties. The penalty was deleted, but the duty demand was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2021 09:36:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1106 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412761</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, dismissing the appellant&#039;s appeal against a demand of central excise duties on capital goods. The appellant&#039;s transition from a Domestic Tariff Area Unit to a 100% Export Oriented Unit and subsequent import of duty-free capital goods under the EPCG Scheme did not absolve them of the duty liability upon exiting the EOU status. Despite arguments on export obligations and revenue neutrality, the Court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions, emphasizing the need for proper documentation and payment of duties. The penalty was deleted, but the duty demand was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>