<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1089 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412744</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for Cenvat Credit on Service Tax paid for Product Liability and Product Recall Insurance Policy as it was an integral part of the cost of the final product during manufacturing. The tribunal set aside the previous disallowance and allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the issue was no longer res-integra based on a previous order concerning the same appellant for an earlier period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2021 09:36:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656859" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1089 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412744</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for Cenvat Credit on Service Tax paid for Product Liability and Product Recall Insurance Policy as it was an integral part of the cost of the final product during manufacturing. The tribunal set aside the previous disallowance and allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the issue was no longer res-integra based on a previous order concerning the same appellant for an earlier period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>