<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1386 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297856</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to allow the contribution to &#039;Sparsh Trust&#039; as a business expenditure under section 37(1), emphasizing its direct link to improving milk quality for the business. The ITAT set aside the disallowance of contribution to the rehabilitation fund for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer, noting the establishment of a separate Rehabilitation Trust under section 12AA. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on &#039;Sparsh Trust&#039; contribution was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal on the rehabilitation fund disallowance was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of establishing a direct business nexus for expenditure claims and compliance with relevant legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2021 09:35:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1386 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297856</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to allow the contribution to &#039;Sparsh Trust&#039; as a business expenditure under section 37(1), emphasizing its direct link to improving milk quality for the business. The ITAT set aside the disallowance of contribution to the rehabilitation fund for fresh consideration by the Assessing Officer, noting the establishment of a separate Rehabilitation Trust under section 12AA. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on &#039;Sparsh Trust&#039; contribution was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal on the rehabilitation fund disallowance was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of establishing a direct business nexus for expenditure claims and compliance with relevant legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>