<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 29 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26686</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notice under section 269D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, related to the acquisition of a property in New Delhi. The notice failed to comply with statutory requirements as it was not published in the Official Gazette before being communicated to the petitioner. Emphasizing strict adherence to statutory procedures, the court held that the defective notice did not initiate valid proceedings, highlighting the importance of precise compliance with statutory provisions in property acquisition matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 29 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26686</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, quashing the notice under section 269D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, related to the acquisition of a property in New Delhi. The notice failed to comply with statutory requirements as it was not published in the Official Gazette before being communicated to the petitioner. Emphasizing strict adherence to statutory procedures, the court held that the defective notice did not initiate valid proceedings, highlighting the importance of precise compliance with statutory provisions in property acquisition matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>