https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297855 The High Court held that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 can examine whether a rule exceeds the rule-making power or conflicts with the parent Act, so the challenge to the tribunal rule was maintainable. It further held that a quorum rule governing administrative business cannot validate quasi-judicial decisions by a body not constituted in the manner required by the statute; the prescribed composition and limited delegation mechanism had to be followed. A smaller body deciding renewal and grant of stage carriage permits was therefore without jurisdiction, the permit order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision according to law. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Sep 2021 17:38:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297855 The High Court held that supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 can examine whether a rule exceeds the rule-making power or conflicts with the parent Act, so the challenge to the tribunal rule was maintainable. It further held that a quorum rule governing administrative business cannot validate quasi-judicial decisions by a body not constituted in the manner required by the statute; the prescribed composition and limited delegation mechanism had to be followed. A smaller body deciding renewal and grant of stage carriage permits was therefore without jurisdiction, the permit order was quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision according to law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Jan 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297855