<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1868 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297850</link>
    <description>Under the mercantile system, prior period expenses are deductible in the year in which the liability crystallises, even if the underlying transaction relates to an earlier period. Statutory contributions made to a regulatory fund, such as ERPC charges, are treated as mandatory payments rather than contractual outgoings and therefore do not attract tax deduction at source. Interest earned on SLDC-UI Fund balances belongs to the regulatory fund and not to the assessee where the assessee lacks beneficial ownership; use of the assessee&#039;s PAN or reflection in Form 26AS does not alter taxability. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the disputed additions accordingly failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:06:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1868 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297850</link>
      <description>Under the mercantile system, prior period expenses are deductible in the year in which the liability crystallises, even if the underlying transaction relates to an earlier period. Statutory contributions made to a regulatory fund, such as ERPC charges, are treated as mandatory payments rather than contractual outgoings and therefore do not attract tax deduction at source. Interest earned on SLDC-UI Fund balances belongs to the regulatory fund and not to the assessee where the assessee lacks beneficial ownership; use of the assessee&#039;s PAN or reflection in Form 26AS does not alter taxability. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to the disputed additions accordingly failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>