<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (2) TMI 134 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297848</link>
    <description>A transfer styled as a management arrangement was examined on its substance: where a running evacuee hotel business, licence and assets were handed over for consideration, and the required prior approval for sale was absent, the order could not be sustained under Section 12A and was treated as invalid. The commentary also states that review proceedings already pending were preserved by the General Clauses Act, that &quot;review&quot; was not confined to the narrow CPC sense, and that a successor Custodian could set aside an illegal predecessor&#039;s order. It further notes that civil court scrutiny remains available where administrative orders are made without jurisdiction, despite statutory finality clauses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:03:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656776" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (2) TMI 134 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297848</link>
      <description>A transfer styled as a management arrangement was examined on its substance: where a running evacuee hotel business, licence and assets were handed over for consideration, and the required prior approval for sale was absent, the order could not be sustained under Section 12A and was treated as invalid. The commentary also states that review proceedings already pending were preserved by the General Clauses Act, that &quot;review&quot; was not confined to the narrow CPC sense, and that a successor Custodian could set aside an illegal predecessor&#039;s order. It further notes that civil court scrutiny remains available where administrative orders are made without jurisdiction, despite statutory finality clauses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>