<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1041 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412696</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition primarily due to the availability of a statutory appeal as an alternate remedy, emphasizing the need to exhaust such remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The court underscored that the appellate authority should independently assess the appeal without influence from the current order. As a result, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was also dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1041 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412696</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition primarily due to the availability of a statutory appeal as an alternate remedy, emphasizing the need to exhaust such remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction. The court underscored that the appellate authority should independently assess the appeal without influence from the current order. As a result, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition was also dismissed, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>