<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1039 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412694</link>
    <description>Revisional assessments under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were vulnerable where the assessing authority merely reproduced the Enforcement Wing proposal without independently examining the material. Applying the Narasus principle, the Court held that the authority must apply its own mind and cannot act as a conduit for the proposal; the penalty-based conclusions were therefore set aside. The request for personal hearing and production of documents was not treated as decisive, because such hearing was not held to be statutorily mandatory for proceedings under Section 27. The matter was remitted for fresh assessment in accordance with the prescribed circular and independent consideration of the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:19:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656742" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1039 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412694</link>
      <description>Revisional assessments under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were vulnerable where the assessing authority merely reproduced the Enforcement Wing proposal without independently examining the material. Applying the Narasus principle, the Court held that the authority must apply its own mind and cannot act as a conduit for the proposal; the penalty-based conclusions were therefore set aside. The request for personal hearing and production of documents was not treated as decisive, because such hearing was not held to be statutorily mandatory for proceedings under Section 27. The matter was remitted for fresh assessment in accordance with the prescribed circular and independent consideration of the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>