<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 44 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26675</link>
    <description>In penalty proceedings for non-compliance with an income-tax notice, the Revenue need not prove mens rea or deliberate default; the provision was treated as operating in the tax field, where the focus is on the default and the assessee&#039;s explanation. The assessee bears the onus to show reasonable cause for failure to comply, especially where the cause lies within its special knowledge, and a rejected explanation unsupported by fresh material will not suffice. The levy of penalty was also held not to be discretionary in the sense accepted by the Tribunal, and cancellation of the penalties was held legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 44 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26675</link>
      <description>In penalty proceedings for non-compliance with an income-tax notice, the Revenue need not prove mens rea or deliberate default; the provision was treated as operating in the tax field, where the focus is on the default and the assessee&#039;s explanation. The assessee bears the onus to show reasonable cause for failure to comply, especially where the cause lies within its special knowledge, and a rejected explanation unsupported by fresh material will not suffice. The levy of penalty was also held not to be discretionary in the sense accepted by the Tribunal, and cancellation of the penalties was held legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>