<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1026 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of depreciation of Rs. 6,54,950. The disallowance was based on the failure to reduce the written down value of assets following a loan waiver, resulting in incorrect depreciation calculations. The Tribunal emphasized that depreciation should be based on the written down value of assets. The challenge to the initiation of re-assessment proceedings was not addressed due to the favorable outcome on the primary issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1026 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance of depreciation of Rs. 6,54,950. The disallowance was based on the failure to reduce the written down value of assets following a loan waiver, resulting in incorrect depreciation calculations. The Tribunal emphasized that depreciation should be based on the written down value of assets. The challenge to the initiation of re-assessment proceedings was not addressed due to the favorable outcome on the primary issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>