<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1025 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412680</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, applying MAP resolution to non-US AE transactions for a TP adjustment in providing ITeS. The resolution, initially covering 94% of the adjustment with the US AE, was extended to non-US AEs based on established legal principles and the absence of distinctions in accounts or TP analysis. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee&#039;s claim, citing precedent and holding that margins accepted in MAP proceedings with the US AE could guide the ALP for non-US AE transactions. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed, and further consideration of raised grounds was deemed unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1025 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412680</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, applying MAP resolution to non-US AE transactions for a TP adjustment in providing ITeS. The resolution, initially covering 94% of the adjustment with the US AE, was extended to non-US AEs based on established legal principles and the absence of distinctions in accounts or TP analysis. The Tribunal found merit in the assessee&#039;s claim, citing precedent and holding that margins accepted in MAP proceedings with the US AE could guide the ALP for non-US AE transactions. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed, and further consideration of raised grounds was deemed unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>