<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1023 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412678</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, stating that the disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified due to the appellant&#039;s compliance with section 194C(6) and the lack of disproved genuineness of transportation expenses. The ITAT also granted condonation of the delay in filing the appeal, considering the circumstances beyond the appellant&#039;s control.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1023 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412678</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, stating that the disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act was unjustified due to the appellant&#039;s compliance with section 194C(6) and the lack of disproved genuineness of transportation expenses. The ITAT also granted condonation of the delay in filing the appeal, considering the circumstances beyond the appellant&#039;s control.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>