<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1545 - MADRAS E HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297841</link>
    <description>The statutory appellate remedy was treated as the proper forum for the assessee&#039;s objections, including alleged breach of natural justice and reliance on the Commissioner&#039;s circular. The rule of alternate remedy was applied as a rule of discretion, not an absolute bar, and writ jurisdiction was said to be available only in exceptional cases such as a challenge to vires, gross breach of natural justice, or patent lack of jurisdiction. As the assessee could raise all such grounds before the appellate authority, interference with the Single Judge&#039;s order was unwarranted and the writ appeal was not maintainable on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1545 - MADRAS E HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297841</link>
      <description>The statutory appellate remedy was treated as the proper forum for the assessee&#039;s objections, including alleged breach of natural justice and reliance on the Commissioner&#039;s circular. The rule of alternate remedy was applied as a rule of discretion, not an absolute bar, and writ jurisdiction was said to be available only in exceptional cases such as a challenge to vires, gross breach of natural justice, or patent lack of jurisdiction. As the assessee could raise all such grounds before the appellate authority, interference with the Single Judge&#039;s order was unwarranted and the writ appeal was not maintainable on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>