<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1965 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297840</link>
    <description>The court held that the defendants acted within their contractual rights by selling pledged shares due to plaintiffs&#039; defaults. The notice period for the sale was deemed reasonable under the Contract Act. The court rejected plaintiffs&#039; claim for damages as they needed to prove the damages first. Consequently, the defendants were not restrained from further actions on the pledged shares, and the case was set for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 07:18:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1965 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297840</link>
      <description>The court held that the defendants acted within their contractual rights by selling pledged shares due to plaintiffs&#039; defaults. The notice period for the sale was deemed reasonable under the Contract Act. The court rejected plaintiffs&#039; claim for damages as they needed to prove the damages first. Consequently, the defendants were not restrained from further actions on the pledged shares, and the case was set for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>