<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1563 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297837</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing margin accepted under MAP for some related-party transactions was not automatically extended to the remaining non-MAP transactions; the Tribunal held that those transactions required a separate, reasoned examination of the comparable margin. As the first appellate authority had not satisfactorily adjudicated that aspect, the matter was restored for fresh consideration with a direction to pass a speaking order after giving adequate hearing. The assessee succeeded on the issue for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1563 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297837</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing margin accepted under MAP for some related-party transactions was not automatically extended to the remaining non-MAP transactions; the Tribunal held that those transactions required a separate, reasoned examination of the comparable margin. As the first appellate authority had not satisfactorily adjudicated that aspect, the matter was restored for fresh consideration with a direction to pass a speaking order after giving adequate hearing. The assessee succeeded on the issue for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>