https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26667 Limitation for filing a revision runs from the date of the appellate order where the party had constructive knowledge, or a clear means of knowing, the date fixed for pronouncement. Findings that both parties were present, the date was fixed immediately after hearing, and the delay in seeking the certified copy and filing the revision remained unexplained were treated as binding factual findings. On that basis, the explanation for delay was found insufficient and the revision was held barred by limitation, with refusal to condone delay upheld. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Jan 2012 13:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26667 Limitation for filing a revision runs from the date of the appellate order where the party had constructive knowledge, or a clear means of knowing, the date fixed for pronouncement. Findings that both parties were present, the date was fixed immediately after hearing, and the delay in seeking the certified copy and filing the revision remained unexplained were treated as binding factual findings. On that basis, the explanation for delay was found insufficient and the revision was held barred by limitation, with refusal to condone delay upheld. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 29 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26667