https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412664 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be used to examine disputed objections about notice, reply, or hearing. On the material before it, the Court could not conclude that no opportunity of hearing had been given, and it left open whether the asserted reply to the Commissioner could be treated as a valid response to the notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner. It also noted the submission that the reply was required to be filed online under the Uttar Pradesh GST Rules. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the appellate remedy. en-us Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2025 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412664 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be used to examine disputed objections about notice, reply, or hearing. On the material before it, the Court could not conclude that no opportunity of hearing had been given, and it left open whether the asserted reply to the Commissioner could be treated as a valid response to the notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner. It also noted the submission that the reply was required to be filed online under the Uttar Pradesh GST Rules. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was directed to pursue the appellate remedy. Case-Laws GST Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412664