<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 995 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412650</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order reducing the addition on account of bogus purchases. The Tribunal found that the assessee had substantiated the genuineness of most purchases, except for one party, justifying the reduction in the addition amount. The decision was based on the evidence provided and the past acceptance of transactions from the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:06:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 995 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412650</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order reducing the addition on account of bogus purchases. The Tribunal found that the assessee had substantiated the genuineness of most purchases, except for one party, justifying the reduction in the addition amount. The decision was based on the evidence provided and the past acceptance of transactions from the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>