https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412641 The COVID-19 limitation extension did not enlarge the separate statutory condonable period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, so an appeal filed well beyond the prescribed time remained barred by limitation. An inquiry under Section 340 CrPC was also unwarranted because the alleged forged memorandum of understanding did not form the basis of the adjudication and was not relied upon in the decision. The challenge therefore failed on limitation and on the request for criminal inquiry, and the impugned order remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412641 The COVID-19 limitation extension did not enlarge the separate statutory condonable period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, so an appeal filed well beyond the prescribed time remained barred by limitation. An inquiry under Section 340 CrPC was also unwarranted because the alleged forged memorandum of understanding did not form the basis of the adjudication and was not relied upon in the decision. The challenge therefore failed on limitation and on the request for criminal inquiry, and the impugned order remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412641