<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 973 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412628</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with the law. The decision highlighted the retrospective effect of the substituted rule and the importance of considering legal amendments in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:05:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 973 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412628</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order. The appellant was entitled to consequential benefits in accordance with the law. The decision highlighted the retrospective effect of the substituted rule and the importance of considering legal amendments in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>