https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297819 Interim restraint against proposed amendments to the Maharashtra Prohibition Act rules was refused because the challenge was premature. The HC held that the State could not be pre-empted from completing the draft rule-making process while objections and suggestions were still under consideration, especially since the draft rules had not yet come into force and remained subject to statutory procedure, including laying before the Legislature under Section 143. Any challenge to the amended rules would arise only if and when they were actually notified and enforced. en-us Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:04:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297819 Interim restraint against proposed amendments to the Maharashtra Prohibition Act rules was refused because the challenge was premature. The HC held that the State could not be pre-empted from completing the draft rule-making process while objections and suggestions were still under consideration, especially since the draft rules had not yet come into force and remained subject to statutory procedure, including laying before the Legislature under Section 143. Any challenge to the amended rules would arise only if and when they were actually notified and enforced. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297819