<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 271(1)(c) invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the charge, reflecting non-application of mind and violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order confirming the penalty and deleted the penalty imposed on the assessee, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:04:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1544 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 271(1)(c) invalid due to the Assessing Officer&#039;s failure to specify the charge, reflecting non-application of mind and violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order confirming the penalty and deleted the penalty imposed on the assessee, allowing the appeal filed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>