https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297801 The Gujarat High Court admitted the appeal and directed notice to the respondent on substantial questions of law concerning ownership of excess stock, the adequacy of reasons for reversing the first appellate authority, and alleged perversity in the Tribunal's decision. The operative effect was that these issues were treated as arguable questions warranting appellate consideration and response from the opposing party. en-us Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2021 15:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297801 The Gujarat High Court admitted the appeal and directed notice to the respondent on substantial questions of law concerning ownership of excess stock, the adequacy of reasons for reversing the first appellate authority, and alleged perversity in the Tribunal's decision. The operative effect was that these issues were treated as arguable questions warranting appellate consideration and response from the opposing party. Case-Laws Income Tax Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297801