<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Orders Release of Goods Detained for Expired E-Way Bills; Confiscation Orders Deemed Unlawful Under CGST Act Section 130.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59787</link>
    <description>Detention of goods - E-way bills expired - Constitutional validity of Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 - deposit of tax again, once the tax is already paid - the petitioner could not able to show that the provisions of the enactments-in-question are unreasonable or the object of these enactments are to destroy a fundamental right/ constitutional right. - However, the respondents have completely failed to show that the petitioner was indeed, given an opportunity of being heard before the passing the orders of the confiscation in Form GST MOV-11. The confiscation orders dated 23.04.2021, passed under Section 130 in Form GST MOV-11, are not found to be passed in accordance with law. - Goods and vehicle to be released on furnishing of bond - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:57:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:57:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Orders Release of Goods Detained for Expired E-Way Bills; Confiscation Orders Deemed Unlawful Under CGST Act Section 130.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59787</link>
      <description>Detention of goods - E-way bills expired - Constitutional validity of Section 129 of CGST Act, 2017 - deposit of tax again, once the tax is already paid - the petitioner could not able to show that the provisions of the enactments-in-question are unreasonable or the object of these enactments are to destroy a fundamental right/ constitutional right. - However, the respondents have completely failed to show that the petitioner was indeed, given an opportunity of being heard before the passing the orders of the confiscation in Form GST MOV-11. The confiscation orders dated 23.04.2021, passed under Section 130 in Form GST MOV-11, are not found to be passed in accordance with law. - Goods and vehicle to be released on furnishing of bond - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:57:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>