https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297799 The appellant successfully appealed against the lower appellate court's decision in a dispute over land adjacent to the plaintiff's house. The court held that the land, despite being separated by a lane, was appurtenant to the plaintiff's property based on beneficial use. The lower court's misinterpretation of evidence and misunderstanding of the concept of appurtenance led to the decision being overturned. The trial court's initial judgment in favor of the plaintiff was reinstated, and the appellant's appeal was allowed, with costs awarded in favor of the plaintiff. en-us Thu, 20 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:17:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297799 The appellant successfully appealed against the lower appellate court's decision in a dispute over land adjacent to the plaintiff's house. The court held that the land, despite being separated by a lane, was appurtenant to the plaintiff's property based on beneficial use. The lower court's misinterpretation of evidence and misunderstanding of the concept of appurtenance led to the decision being overturned. The trial court's initial judgment in favor of the plaintiff was reinstated, and the appellant's appeal was allowed, with costs awarded in favor of the plaintiff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297799