<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Initiation of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under IBC Section 9, Rejects Appellant&#039;s &#039;Icegate&#039; Defense.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59775</link>
    <description>Initiation of CIRP - existence of debt and dispute or not - dispute with regard to demand notice - The Adjudicating Authority has rightly found that there are dues outstanding which attract Section 9 of IBC. The Appellant is trying to confuse by referring to portal of ‘Icegate’ but when there are documents in favour of the Operational Creditor, it is not found that Appellant is able to show that the goods were not received and that the Corporate Debtor did not have any liability to pay. We do not find any fault with the impugned order admitting the Application under Section 9. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 12:35:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 12:35:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Initiation of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under IBC Section 9, Rejects Appellant&#039;s &#039;Icegate&#039; Defense.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59775</link>
      <description>Initiation of CIRP - existence of debt and dispute or not - dispute with regard to demand notice - The Adjudicating Authority has rightly found that there are dues outstanding which attract Section 9 of IBC. The Appellant is trying to confuse by referring to portal of ‘Icegate’ but when there are documents in favour of the Operational Creditor, it is not found that Appellant is able to show that the goods were not received and that the Corporate Debtor did not have any liability to pay. We do not find any fault with the impugned order admitting the Application under Section 9. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 12:35:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=59775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>