<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 1044 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297797</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the rejection of bail for the Petitioners in a case involving large-scale fabrication of documents for illegal imports under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized the seriousness of the offense, the substantial loss of revenue, and the systematic nature of the fraudulent activities. The decision highlighted the gravity of the offense as grounds for denying bail at that stage, without prejudice to bail granted to other co-accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 12:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 1044 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297797</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the rejection of bail for the Petitioners in a case involving large-scale fabrication of documents for illegal imports under Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Court emphasized the seriousness of the offense, the substantial loss of revenue, and the systematic nature of the fraudulent activities. The decision highlighted the gravity of the offense as grounds for denying bail at that stage, without prejudice to bail granted to other co-accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>