<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 955 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s directive for the Assessing Officer to accept revised income through revised computation without the need for filing a revised return. Relying on the &#039;Goetze India Ltd.&#039; case, the Tribunal clarified that the power to entertain such claims lies with the Assessing Authority, not the Tribunal. The Department&#039;s argument that a revised computation should be accompanied by a revised return was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the distinction in powers between the Assessing Officer and the Appellate Authority. Consequently, the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 955 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s directive for the Assessing Officer to accept revised income through revised computation without the need for filing a revised return. Relying on the &#039;Goetze India Ltd.&#039; case, the Tribunal clarified that the power to entertain such claims lies with the Assessing Authority, not the Tribunal. The Department&#039;s argument that a revised computation should be accompanied by a revised return was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the distinction in powers between the Assessing Officer and the Appellate Authority. Consequently, the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>