https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297793 Marking a document as an exhibit under Order 13 Rule 4 CPC concerns admission in evidence and identification, not conclusive proof of its contents. A document may be admitted in evidence yet still remain open to challenge on the question whether it was actually proved on the record. The distinction between filing, admission, and proof is reinforced by the rules governing proof of wills and by Original Side practice directions on exhibit endorsement. The contrary practice was disapproved, and documents tendered and admitted in evidence were directed to be marked with numerical serial numbers rather than treated as proved merely by exhibit marking. en-us Thu, 23 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2021 10:34:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297793 Marking a document as an exhibit under Order 13 Rule 4 CPC concerns admission in evidence and identification, not conclusive proof of its contents. A document may be admitted in evidence yet still remain open to challenge on the question whether it was actually proved on the record. The distinction between filing, admission, and proof is reinforced by the rules governing proof of wills and by Original Side practice directions on exhibit endorsement. The contrary practice was disapproved, and documents tendered and admitted in evidence were directed to be marked with numerical serial numbers rather than treated as proved merely by exhibit marking. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297793