https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297792 The Bombay High Court, in a case involving a petition to recall the plaintiff for further cross-examination on an exhibited document, clarified that the act of exhibiting a document does not imply its proof. The court emphasized that the document must be proved according to the Evidence Act and that exhibiting it is merely an administrative step. Consequently, the defendant was allowed to challenge the document's validity during arguments. As no prejudice would result from this clarification, the petition to recall the plaintiff for cross-examination was dismissed, with parties instructed to follow the court's order. en-us Mon, 09 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2021 10:30:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297792 The Bombay High Court, in a case involving a petition to recall the plaintiff for further cross-examination on an exhibited document, clarified that the act of exhibiting a document does not imply its proof. The court emphasized that the document must be proved according to the Evidence Act and that exhibiting it is merely an administrative step. Consequently, the defendant was allowed to challenge the document's validity during arguments. As no prejudice would result from this clarification, the petition to recall the plaintiff for cross-examination was dismissed, with parties instructed to follow the court's order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297792