<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 938 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412593</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was granted in a dispute arising from alleged misuse of cheques and a dishonoured cheque connected to business dealings, with notice and proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act having been initiated. The Court noted the applicant&#039;s claim of supplying material to the complainant&#039;s concern and also took note of the withdrawal of similar proceedings against a co-accused after settlement, while expressly refraining from commenting on the merits. The applicant was held entitled to anticipatory bail and was directed to be released on arrest upon executing the prescribed bond with surety and complying with conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:17:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 938 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412593</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was granted in a dispute arising from alleged misuse of cheques and a dishonoured cheque connected to business dealings, with notice and proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act having been initiated. The Court noted the applicant&#039;s claim of supplying material to the complainant&#039;s concern and also took note of the withdrawal of similar proceedings against a co-accused after settlement, while expressly refraining from commenting on the merits. The applicant was held entitled to anticipatory bail and was directed to be released on arrest upon executing the prescribed bond with surety and complying with conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>