https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412591 The Court denied the bail application under Sections 132(1)(B) and 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act, citing the gravity of the accusations, substantial amount involved in GST evasion, and the applicant's alleged role as the mastermind behind the fraudulent scheme. Concerns about evidence tampering if granted bail led to the rejection, considering the non-bailable and cognizable nature of the offense. en-us Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:17:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412591 The Court denied the bail application under Sections 132(1)(B) and 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act, citing the gravity of the accusations, substantial amount involved in GST evasion, and the applicant's alleged role as the mastermind behind the fraudulent scheme. Concerns about evidence tampering if granted bail led to the rejection, considering the non-bailable and cognizable nature of the offense. Case-Laws GST Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412591