<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 931 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal, stating that the relief sought by the Appellant could not be granted. The Appellant was allowed to contest the eviction proceedings initiated by Respondent No. 2 but could not claim preferential treatment during the CIRP. The Appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 931 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Appeal, stating that the relief sought by the Appellant could not be granted. The Appellant was allowed to contest the eviction proceedings initiated by Respondent No. 2 but could not claim preferential treatment during the CIRP. The Appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>