<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 929 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412584</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision not to set aside the ex-parte order after the constitution of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). It was determined that the notice was not duly served on the Corporate Debtor, and the settlement between the Corporate Debtor and Operational Creditor could be pursued through the appropriate legal provisions for withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:17:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 929 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412584</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision not to set aside the ex-parte order after the constitution of the Committee of Creditors (CoC). It was determined that the notice was not duly served on the Corporate Debtor, and the settlement between the Corporate Debtor and Operational Creditor could be pursued through the appropriate legal provisions for withdrawal of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>