https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412581 Technical objections to a section 9 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application were rejected where the filing was backed by board authorisation and a named representative's authority, and the corporate debtor raised no challenge to the operational creditor's internal authorisation process. The section 8 demand notice was also upheld because the accompanying contract, invoice, bill of lading and related shipping records substantially satisfied the prescribed requirements. On the merits, contemporaneous documents, acknowledgements and emails showed delivery, acceptance and outstanding liability, so the defence of non-receipt of goods failed and operational debt and default were treated as established. en-us Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:17:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412581 Technical objections to a section 9 Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code application were rejected where the filing was backed by board authorisation and a named representative's authority, and the corporate debtor raised no challenge to the operational creditor's internal authorisation process. The section 8 demand notice was also upheld because the accompanying contract, invoice, bill of lading and related shipping records substantially satisfied the prescribed requirements. On the merits, contemporaneous documents, acknowledgements and emails showed delivery, acceptance and outstanding liability, so the defence of non-receipt of goods failed and operational debt and default were treated as established. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 20 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=412581