<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 32 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26645</link>
    <description>The legal status of a dissolved firm and the applicability of representative assessment provisions were treated as questions of law because they turned on the legal effect of admitted facts, including the compromise decree and takeover by joint receivers. The High Court also noted that the assessee&#039;s proposed questions overlapped, so it reframed them to capture the real controversy. It directed the Tribunal to refer four questions of law for opinion and sent the matter back for a statement of the case on the reframed issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:34:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 32 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26645</link>
      <description>The legal status of a dissolved firm and the applicability of representative assessment provisions were treated as questions of law because they turned on the legal effect of admitted facts, including the compromise decree and takeover by joint receivers. The High Court also noted that the assessee&#039;s proposed questions overlapped, so it reframed them to capture the real controversy. It directed the Tribunal to refer four questions of law for opinion and sent the matter back for a statement of the case on the reframed issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>