<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 1353 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 3,00,00,000 under Section 68 of the IT Act, 1961, due to unproved share application and premium money. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the acceptance of a 9% profit rate for gross receipts. The Revenue&#039;s request to set aside the CIT(A) order was rejected, with the Tribunal finding that the CIT(A) had appropriately considered the evidence and legal precedents in making its decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:16:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 1353 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 3,00,00,000 under Section 68 of the IT Act, 1961, due to unproved share application and premium money. Additionally, the Tribunal confirmed the acceptance of a 9% profit rate for gross receipts. The Revenue&#039;s request to set aside the CIT(A) order was rejected, with the Tribunal finding that the CIT(A) had appropriately considered the evidence and legal precedents in making its decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>