<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1562 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297766</link>
    <description>A new plea based on section 46 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was raised for the first time before the ITAT, and the lower authorities had not examined it. The Tribunal held that the contention required fresh adjudication with an opportunity to place supporting material, and remitted the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for de novo consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:16:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1562 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297766</link>
      <description>A new plea based on section 46 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 was raised for the first time before the ITAT, and the lower authorities had not examined it. The Tribunal held that the contention required fresh adjudication with an opportunity to place supporting material, and remitted the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for de novo consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>