<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1677 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297785</link>
    <description>Refusal to issue FORM-D after approval of an amalgamation scheme raised questions on whether the refusal conflicted with a State Government exemption and whether the transferor company&#039;s tax benefits could pass to the transferee on merger. The revision was admitted on the stated questions of law and was listed for disposal later. The text does not record any final determination on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:16:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1677 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297785</link>
      <description>Refusal to issue FORM-D after approval of an amalgamation scheme raised questions on whether the refusal conflicted with a State Government exemption and whether the transferor company&#039;s tax benefits could pass to the transferee on merger. The revision was admitted on the stated questions of law and was listed for disposal later. The text does not record any final determination on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>