<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1546 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297779</link>
    <description>Jurisdiction under Section 20 CPC was raised alongside the question whether summons should issue in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC. The matter was directed to proceed with issuance of summons to the defendant, and the case was renotified for further hearing. No final adjudication was made on the jurisdiction objection at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:16:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1546 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297779</link>
      <description>Jurisdiction under Section 20 CPC was raised alongside the question whether summons should issue in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC. The matter was directed to proceed with issuance of summons to the defendant, and the case was renotified for further hearing. No final adjudication was made on the jurisdiction objection at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>