https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297757 The Appellant was directed to file the Transfer Pricing Officer's order within 3 weeks, with a penalty of Rs. 10,000 for delay. The case involved substantial questions on comparables under Rule 10D, eligibility for deduction under Section 10A, interest on housing loan deduction under Section 10B, nature of compensation received, rate of depreciation on computer peripherals, and interest on income tax refund. The Court emphasized prompt resolution of the comparables issue to avoid repetitive appeals. The case was listed for further proceedings in the Regular List starting from the week of 24th February 2014. en-us Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:03:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297757 The Appellant was directed to file the Transfer Pricing Officer's order within 3 weeks, with a penalty of Rs. 10,000 for delay. The case involved substantial questions on comparables under Rule 10D, eligibility for deduction under Section 10A, interest on housing loan deduction under Section 10B, nature of compensation received, rate of depreciation on computer peripherals, and interest on income tax refund. The Court emphasized prompt resolution of the comparables issue to avoid repetitive appeals. The case was listed for further proceedings in the Regular List starting from the week of 24th February 2014. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297757