<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 909 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297756</link>
    <description>The HC adjourned the matter for further consideration and directed the parties to explore an amicable resolution through the Finance Secretary. The amount deposited by the appellant was to be treated as payment towards tax in the present case, expressly without prejudice to the parties&#039; rights and contentions. The text reflects a procedural accommodation rather than a final adjudication on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:00:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 909 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297756</link>
      <description>The HC adjourned the matter for further consideration and directed the parties to explore an amicable resolution through the Finance Secretary. The amount deposited by the appellant was to be treated as payment towards tax in the present case, expressly without prejudice to the parties&#039; rights and contentions. The text reflects a procedural accommodation rather than a final adjudication on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>