<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 416 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297754</link>
    <description>A contextual and purposive reading of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 was applied to the incorporated definition of &quot;minerals&quot; from the Mines Act, 1952, and water was treated as falling within that definition because it can be obtained from the earth by drilling. The statutory scheme was therefore read to permit transportation of water through pipelines laid under the Act. The same scheme also allowed acts necessary for laying, maintenance and utilisation of the pipeline, so additional pipeline activity for carrying water was regarded as permissible without a fresh acquisition process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:22:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=656344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 416 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297754</link>
      <description>A contextual and purposive reading of the Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines (Acquisition of Right of User in Land) Act, 1962 was applied to the incorporated definition of &quot;minerals&quot; from the Mines Act, 1952, and water was treated as falling within that definition because it can be obtained from the earth by drilling. The statutory scheme was therefore read to permit transportation of water through pipelines laid under the Act. The same scheme also allowed acts necessary for laying, maintenance and utilisation of the pipeline, so additional pipeline activity for carrying water was regarded as permissible without a fresh acquisition process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>